University Medical Center At Dallas - 914 Words

The Early Years (1909-1990s) Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas was established as Texas Baptist Memorial Sanitarium. Chartered on Oct. 16, 1903, by the State of Texas, the hospital began in a 14-room renovated house. In 1900, there were 3 contributors who founded Baylor and one of them was who are Charles M. Rosser, M.D., founder of the Baylor College of Medicine, who saw the need for a hospital of great importance for a growing city like Dallas, and which would support the medical school. The second founder was Rev. George W. Truett, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Dallas, convinced Dallas citizens to build a great humanitarian hospital, and thirdly, Colonel C.C. Slaughter, a devout Baptist and wealthy cattleman, gives a major gift of $50,000 to establish the hospital. There were many contributors who helped raise funds for the hospital and one of them was The Baptist General Convention of Texas. Another discovery was that of Texas Baptist Memorial Sanitarium in 1909 which moved into a new 250-bed facility and opened as the Southwest s most modern hospital. The Baylor University School of Nursing began around the same time and this was due to a generous donation from Col. C.C. Slaughter, and one of his last ones before he died in 1919. It is estimated that he contributed to more than $200,000. In 1921 Texas Baptist Memorial Sanitarium becomes Baylor Hospital to reflect its relationship with Baylor University in Waco, Texas. The hospital, located inShow MoreRelatedWhy I Should Be A Nurse1077 Words   |  5 Pagesa school based on my major is something I thought was normal. For this reason, I really took the time to consider and weigh my options. Hence, one option that was very apparent, is the location of the nursing school. Some colleges have a separate medical campus located in major cities with access to large hospitals, while some have the hospitals and offices right down the street on campus. I weighed the option of what would best fit my experience for a lot longer than I was expecting. At times, IRead MoreWellness Programs: Disease Management Essay1564 Words   |  7 Pagesimplement and evaluate interventions to improve the health of that population, and provide care for individual patients in the context of the culture, health status, and health needs of the populations of which they are a member (Association of American Medical Colleges, 1999). Wellness Programs Wellness programs are organized and coordinated programs with a goal of enhancing the physical, mental, and emotional status of individuals (Watt, Verma, Flynn, 2008). The functional elements of a wellnessRead MoreMoving To Arlington Essay723 Words   |  3 PagesMoving to Arlington Arlington is a city in Texas located to the Western side of Dallas and Eastern side of Fort Worth Metroplex. It is the seventh highly populated cities in Texas and fort-eighth in United States with a population density of about 360,000. Moving to Arlington TX is very convenient since it has a housing market which has been ranked fourth in the country in relation to affordability. With the presence of Six Flags over Texas, Texas Rangers Ballpark and the Six Flags theme park, theRead MoreBecoming A Pediatric Nurse Practitioner1077 Words   |  5 PagesMy name is Kristen Simoneaux, and I am a Sophomore here at Lamar University. I am from Nederland Texas, and I graduated from Nederland High School in 2013. I have lived in Nederland all of my life, and I continue to live here. I am going to Lamar University because it is close to home, and it has an excellent nursing program. My major is nursing, and I plan to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree in May 2017. I am apply ing to the nursing program for the Fall of 2015, and I willRead MoreUT Southwesten Medical School835 Words   |  3 Pages UT Southwestern UT Southwestern Medical School was formed in 1943 in the Southwestern Medical District of Dallas, Texas. It started off as a small wartime medical college and since then has grown exponentially. It now provides care to almost 90,000 patients and oversees 2 million outpatient visits and is affiliated with four hospitals: Parkland Memorial Hospital, Childrens Medical Center, Zale Lipshy University Hospital, and St. Paul University Hospital. In 2013, UT Southwestern was ranked 31 inRead MoreLocal Hospital Review1053 Words   |  5 PagesJohnnese M. Jones Local Hospital Reviews MHA 5026 (u02a1) Dr. Beauvais October 20, 2013 Baylor Scott amp; White Health (Dallas, TX and Temple, TX) Scott and White Hospital was founded in 1904 by Dr. Scott and Dr. White and was named Temple Sanitarium. By 1922, Dr. White had passed away and the conversion of the hospital was changed to Scott amp; White Memorial Hospital. It has been comprised of the mission towards delivering an affordable, high quality of healthcare services to allRead MoreCauses And Treatments Of Gene Therapy1740 Words   |  7 Pages Drucker English 103 March 2, 2015 Gene Therapy Large amounts of medical treatments are available for combatting and controlling diseases, disorders, and illness. Diseases and illnesses that were fatal to the human body can be cured or prevented through vaccines. However, there are still many other diseases that can’t be cured. Many diseases have drugs and medicine that can help relieve or regulate symptoms of different medical conditions and disorders, but they do not help fix the problem at itsRead MoreFastest Essay877 Words   |  4 Pagesthe outskirts of Dallas, Texas. The city became popular because it was an affordable place outside of the city to start a family. What was once a quiet rural suburb has now turned into a booming city of its own. Over time, the city has become the central location for business corporations which has almost doubled the cost of living and annual income per household since the year 2000. The growth of the city has caused an increase in the number of schools, hospitals, recreation centers , churches, andRead MoreExploring Data Sources And Gathering Appropriate Information783 Words   |  4 PagesSutter Medical Center, Castro Valley, CA DPR Construction 2 UHS Texoma Medical Center, Denison, Texas DPR Construction/ Turner Construction Joint Venture 3 Cumberland Hall Hospital, Hopkinsville, Kentucky DPR Construction/ Turner Construction Joint Venture 4 Springwoods Behavioral Health, Fayetteville, Arkansas Brasfield Gorrie 5 USC School of Cinematic Arts, CA Hathaway Dinwiddie (Phase 1 2) / Matt Construction (Phase 3) 6 City of Hope, Leslie Susan Gonda Diabetes Genetic Research Center ExpansionRead MoreThe Ethical And Legal Issues Of The United States Case Of Ebola1274 Words   |  6 PagesThe first United States case of Ebola was reported on September 25, 2014, when a man from Liberia sought help at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas. That man was Thomas Eric Duncan. Duncan, who eventually died, started the spread of the virus by coming into contact with two health care workers at the hospital. Making this the start of what has become the headline for media outlets around America. The Ebola outbreak in America has sparked discussion about the ethical and legal issues a journalist

An Analysis of Freedom Riders The Documentary by Stanley...

Stanley Nelson chronicles the journey of a group of individuals, known as the Freedom Riders, whom fought for the rights of African Americans to have the same amenities and access as the Caucasians. The purpose of the Freedom Rides was to deliberately violate the Jim Crow laws of the south that prohibited blacks and whites from mixing together on buses and trains. Expectedly, many of the Freedom Riders were beaten and the majority was imprisoned. This carried on for the majority of 1961 and culminated with the Interstate Commerce Commission issuing an order to end the segregation in bus and rail stations. Nelson encapsulates this entire movement in about two hours. At the end of the two hours, the viewer is emotionally tied to the†¦show more content†¦It gives us one of the many messages the movement gave us, which is that the strength of a movement lays within the determination of the people. It is immediately conveyed when the shot began with Rep. Lewis’ words â₠¬Å"and that nothing, but nothing, was going to stop this movement.† Nelson slowly backs out of the shot to reveal more members of the Freedom Riders as the music intensifies. This reveals the gradual increase of participation in the Freedom Rides. The shot began with just one white person and Nelson is conveying the small number of whites that participated in the beginning. As the shot expands, more white people are included proportionately to the blacks (more blacks than whites). While the shot is backing out, Nelson randomly replaces one Rider with another. I believe that he is suggesting while each rider was autonomous, they were all one. As one, they all share the collective goal of ultimately destroying segregation. The music that is playing in the background lends incredible support to the shot. Nelson is trying to create a sense of understanding of what these individuals endured while at the same time creating a sense of optimism that the hardships the Freedom Riders en dured would not be in vein. The collection of Riders fades, as the music continues to play, to a newspaper heading that reads â€Å"ICC Forbids Bus station Segregation.† Quickly, it fades to another headline that reads â€Å"Bus Terminals Told to Mix Up or Close Up† as historian Raymond

Information and Communication Integral Technology

Question: Discuss about the Information and Communication Integral Technology. Answer: Introduction Information and communication technology has become an integral part of human life. It has merged with human lifestyle making life easier. ICT is pervasive touches each and every sphere of human life which can often be unpredictable and risky and hence it is important for people to understand how much leverage people should give to IT in their lives. Not only in peoples personal lives but even in the professional world ICT has become an extremely important aspect. With the increase in the utilisation of ICT in the corporate world ethical issues have crept in. these ethical issues not only affect the operations of an organisation but it also affects the overall performance of the employees. The common ethical issues of ICT in a workplace are privacy, data security, accuracy and accessibility of information (van den Hoven et al., 2012). These ethical issues have significantly affected the operations of different organisations, and one such company that has been affected by ethical issu e related to ICT is Absus Technology. Overview of the organisation and ethical issue related to ICT Absus technology is a medium scale IT operations involved in mainly in developing websites and applications. Moreover, it focuses on providing all kinds of online marketing solutions. The company has been able to spread its business in different parts of Sydney and also working in Melbourne and Perth. The organisation has a total strength of 95 employees including the designing and developing team. In the recent past the organisation implemented an organisational audit especially on the data privacy and security section which showed that it hasnt had expected projects coming in which indicated there might be issues of data security. Data security is one of the major ethical issues attached to Information and Communication Technology. From the audit it has been assessed that data and leads are going out which might be due to the flaw in the database system or may be because of an external threat to the system. The analysis of the issue is done with the help of Doing Ethics Technique ( Stahl et al., 2012). Application of DET on the ethical issue There are several questions which are asked by DET Framework in order to understand the impact of the ethical issue and they are discussed below: The Audit body of Absus Technology has analysed the overall operations through which it has been found out that there have been significant data spillage from the main database of the organisation. The audit body assumes that either this has happened due to a flaw of the database which has been used by an individual or external threats which has helped to sale across information from the organisational database. This also questions the commitment and integrity of the employees working in the organisation (Cotton, 2014). From the audit it has been found out that the database is hacked with a separately bounced IP address that has been consistent in the last few days. There have been evidences that constantly the bounced IP has worked on the database taking considerable amount of data from the company. From initial interrogation the audit committee has been able to raise question on the database administrators as he didnt take proper approach in maintaining the security of the database which led to the theft of data. Ethical and non ethical issues Lack employee commitment is one of the key issues in this case. Threat to data security. Constant data spillage. Questioning of the role of employees (Tavani, 2011). The organisation Absus technology is majorly affected. In the last couple of years the company had generated significant amount of revenue which has helped the company to plan for further expansion but this data theft has affected the business performance of the organisation significantly reducing its revenue and profit generation. Apart from that the employees and the investors attached with the company would be affected as well. In this scenario the company might have to cut head counts as well as may be it has to shut down operations of a particular division which would affect the investment and return of the investors (Stahl et al., 2014). What are ethical issues and implications? At the present moment the main ethical issue that the organisation faces is data security for the lack of commitment of the employees working the database administration section. These employees have been non caring regarding the proper analysis of threats to the database as well as their unethical behavior towards the operations has already caused significant business loss for the organisation. Hence it could be said that loss in the data security has been the major issue for the organisation and its implications could further lead to loss clients and constant business loss and procrastination of the expansion program (Zheng Stahl, 2012). There are different steps which could be taken to resolve this issue. First of all a complete analysis of the issue will help to identify the felons and accordingly taking steps against them to understand the shortcoming of the system. Strong steps will have to be taken in order to make sure ant further issues with the database dont happen. Doing a complete revamp of the system and implementing new database with better technology. Recruitment and scanning of the employees working in the database administration section, constant analysis of the incoming data and online audit of the data transactions (Al-Saggaf Burmeister, 2013). All the above options suggested are effective to resolve this issue but doing a complete revamp of the system wouldnt solve the matter alone and it will require efficient and honest employees to handle the database and keeping a thorough check on it. It could be said that if the employees are efficient, honest and committed towards the growth and development of the company and shows ownership there cannot be any kind of issues in the organisation. It might sound to be a reactive suggestion but it could be said that going for recruitment of efficient employees in the database administration section and constantly monitoring them would be the best option for the organisation Absus Technology as it will help them to not only understand the issues with the database but also the commitment of the employees to fix it up which would definitely reduce data theft possibilities and increase data security (Burmeister et al., 2014). Conclusion The organisation Absus Technology could amend the option of recruiting reliable and efficient employees to combat the issue of data theft and security. The study highlights the importance of analysing ethical issues in the workplace as well as suggests recommendations through DET which has helped to cover up the objectives of the study. References Al-Saggaf, Y., Burmeister, O. K. (2013). A survey of Australian ICT professionals perceptions regarding the most common ethical problems they face in the workplace. InProceedings of the Seventh AICE Conference(pp. 43-48). Burmeister, O., Al-Saggaf, Y., Schwartz, M., Johnson, L. (2014). Internet resources to help Australian ICT professionals identify and solve ethical challenges. ACIS. Cotton, M. (2014). Ethics and Technology. InEthics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach(pp. 25-41). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Stahl, B. C., Eden, G., Jirotka, M., Coeckelbergh, M. (2014). From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT: The transition of reference discourses informing ethics-related research in information systems.Information Management,51(6), 810-818. Stahl, B. C., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K., ... Rader, M. (2012). Identifying the ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: an essay on issues, concepts and method.Ethical Impact of Technological Advancements and Applications in Society, 61-79. Tavani, H. T. (2011).Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing. John Wiley Sons. van den Hoven, J., Helbing, D., Pedreschi, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Gianotti, F., Christen, M. (2012). FuturICTThe road towards ethical ICT.The European Physical Journal Special Topics,214(1), 153-181. Zheng, Y., Stahl, B. C. (2012). Evaluating emerging ICTs: A critical capability approach of technology. InThe capability approach, technology and design(pp. 57-76). Springer Netherlands.

The Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci, Sr. Essay Example

The Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci, Sr. Paper It was at this time that Charles J. Ontological, Sir. , became the president and CEO of the Park Avenue Bank. He also assumed a place on the Banks Board of Directors. Antagonistic was responsible for organizing a group of investors that invested more than $10 million into the Park Avenue Bank in 2004, which had four retail branches In the Manhattan and Brooklyn areas of New York City, and he apparently Impressed those Investors with his previous work in turning around troubled banks (Well and Bray). In addition to holding CEO, president, and board positions for the Park Avenue Bank, Antagonistic was also involved in a number f other businesses. Antagonistic was also the 100% owner of Bedford Consulting Group, Inc. , Easy Wealth Group, Ltd. , and the Park Avenue Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Additionally, he had 20% ownership in three properties in Fishkill, NY: one at 1042 Main Street, another at 2 Broad Street, and the last at 48 Jackson Street. Furthermore, Antagonistic also held 20% ownership In a company called TTS Capital. All of these businesses will play roles In the schemes In which Ontological engaged. In short, Antagonistic abused his position at the Park Avenue Bank by engaging in at least eight different schemes involving fraud and/or misuse of company funds. We will write a custom essay sample on The Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci, Sr. specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci, Sr. specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci, Sr. specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In a majority of these schemes, he had help in the form of co- conspirators, none of whose identities have been revealed at this point. The main co- conspirator will be referred to as Mr.. X throughout this paper. Although it is unknown how many people work for him, at least three of Mr.. Axs employees and/or associates also conspired with Ontological. Those three are referred to as Mr.. W, Mr.. Y, and Mr.. Z. Mr.. X became a client of the Park Avenue Bank in 2007, and he brought with him a umber of different businesses, each one of which required a separate account at the Bank. In the complaint against Antagonistic, those businesses are referred to as the Oxygen-related entities and include the following companies: Oxygen Unlimited, LLc; oxygen unsuited II, LLc; RAH; SQ, LLc; River Falls Botanical services; SAD Realty, Inc. ; and TTS Capital, LLC. As was noted above, Ontological had 20% ownership of TTS Capital. As with the businesses that Antagonistic owned, many of the Oxygen- related entities figured into the scams that Antagonistic and his co-conspirators carried out. One additional company that played a key role was the US Insurance Group, or USIA. USIA also had an account at the Bank, and Oxygen Unlimited had a 25% put option on USIA, which suggests that Mr.. X had a hand in USIA as well. Furthermore, Mr.. Axs administrative assistant was an account signer on all of the Oxygen-related entitles as well as on ten SUSIE account. As tatterdemalion, Ontological was Involved in at least eight different schemes in his time at the Park Avenue Bank. One of these involved the leasing and maintenance of the three properties in Fishkill, NY, in which he had partial ownership. Beginning sometime in 2005, the Park Avenue Bank began leasing the house at 1042 Main Street. The first floor of the house was reserved for the Bedford Consulting Group, which was owned by Antagonistic, and the second floor was used as an office by Bank employees. Additionally, the Bank paid approximately $750,000 to have a storage center built behind the house to accommodate the Banks information technology recovery equipment. The Park Avenue Bank also entered into lease agreements in 2008 for both the property at 2 Broad Street and at 48 Jackson Street. Although Antagonistic indicated that both properties would be used as storage/ assister recovery sites by the Bank, as of 2010, the Bank had yet to use either property in any way. However, despite using only one of the three properties, the Bank paid out more than $1 million in rent and other expenses to these three properties. At no time was it disclosed that Antagonistic had part ownership of any of these buildings. Another scheme involves another one of the companies that Antagonistic owned Easy Wealth Group, Ltd. In early 2006, Antagonistic approached one of his associates with a business opportunity: Easy Wealth was losing money, and Antagonistic was hoping to recoup his investment. He therefore asked his associate to take over the business, promising that the Park Avenue Bank would provide financing. Antagonistic helped his associate prepare the necessary loan paperwork, making it appear that the associate had owned Easy Wealth since 2004 and omitting any connection with Antagonistic. He also helped to create false documents for the application, including a falsified profit and loss statement for Easy Wealths 2005 fiscal year, and false personal financial statements for his associate. Based on the falsified application, the Bank approved a loan of $300,000 to Easy Wealth. At no time as Antibiotics ownership or and financial interest in Easy Money disclosed. In fact, Antagonistic himself personally approved the $300,000 loan. Shortly after his associate was approved for the loan, Antagonistic asked his associate for $70,000 in two interest- free loans. Both times, the associate made checks payable to Bedford Consulting Group. Antagonistic finally repaid some of the money in 2008, but never repaid $20,000 of the loan nor any of the interest that the associate had to pay on the money. Between May 2006 and June 2009, Antagonistic incrementally approved credit increases to Easy Wealth from the original $300,000 to $400,000. He also twice extended the loan due date by a year (for a total of two years), and then in April 2009 extended the due date by another 90 days. In June 2009, Easy Wealth ceased to operate and Antibiotics associate filed for bankruptcy. At that time, Easy Wealth still owed the Bank the entire $400,000 balance. The Bank therefore had to write off the entire amount of the loan, causing a $400,000 loss. As mentioned earlier, Antagonistic had 20% ownership in one of the Oxygen-related entities, TTS Capital. In November 2008, TTS Capital opened an account at the Park Avenue Bank, but no money was deposited r transferred into that account. During 2008, Mr.. W, who worked for Mr.. X, wrote two checks against the TTS Capital Account, totaling $67,000. Antagonistic had one of his employees approve the overdraft fees and pay the checks. In November 2009, the bank was forced to write off those overdraft fees, causing a $67,000 loss. At no point In tale was It Lacrosse Tanat Ontological Ana a Atlanta Interest In I SF capita Antagonistic also approved a number of other overdraft fees on various Oxygen-related entities. In fact, as was disclosed in a Department of Justice Press Release, Antagonistic approved approximately $8. Lion worth of overdrafts from 2007 to 2009 on various accounts associated with Mr.. X. In exchange for this service, Antagonistic was allowed to use Mr.. Axs personal plane. According to witnesses, Antagonistic took at least 10 flights on Mr.. Axs plane, none of which Antagonistic paid for. According to the complaint filed against him, Antagonistic flew, among other places, to Phoenix, Arizona, to attend the Super Bowl in February 2008, to Augusta, Georgia, to watch the Masters Golf Tournament, to Florida to visit a relative, and to Panama. Again, at no time was his relationship with Mr.. X disclosed. In 2009, the Bank failed to approve some overdraft fees on some of the Oxygen-related accounts, and some checks written against those account therefore bounced. Mr.. Axs administrative assistant informed Antibiotics assistant that the free plane rides were over and that Antagonistic could no longer use Mr.. Axs personal plane. Perhaps the most notorious scheme in which Antagonistic engaged involved his alleged investment of $6. 5 million into the Park Avenue Bank. According to the IBID and NYSE, banks are rated as well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, and intellectualized. In August 2008, Antagonistic was informed that the Bank had been downgraded from well capitalized to merely adequately capitalized. By early October 2008, the Bank had been further downgraded to intellectualized. In order to appease regulators and restore the Banks position, Antagonistic invested what he claimed to be $6. 5 million of his own money into the Bank in exchange for common stock from the holding company. He did this over three separate transactions: a $2. 6 million investment made on October 8, 2008; another $2. 4 million investment made on October 16, 2008; and a final $1. 5 million investment made on November 17, 2008. In reality, these investments were a sham. The $6. 5 million was actually money from the Bank that was transferred to a variety of accounts and then reinvested into the Bank under the guise of a large personal investment from Antagonistic. On October 6, 2008, Oxygen Unlimited, one of the companies with which Mr.. X was associated, drew down $2. 6 million against an existing line of credit. The money was then deposited on the same day into the Oxygen Unlimited II account. Later that day, the entire amount was then transferred to the SIGH account, with which Mr.. X was also associated. Yet still on the same day, the entire $2. Lion was then transferred from the SIGH account to a Bank of America account for Bedford Consulting Group. As mentioned earlier, Antagonistic owned 100% of Bedford. On October 7, a check written for $2. 6 million from Bedford Consulting Group was deposited into Antibiotics personal checking account at the Park Avenue Bank. On October 8, Antagonistic wrote a check to the Bank for $2. 6 million, calling it a personal capital investment. After making this investment, Antagonistic wrote a letter to the IBID asking that that Banks status be restored to adequately capitalized so that the Bank could continue to accept brokered deposits. Based on this information, the IBID did in fact grant the waiver and allowed The Park Avenue Bank to engage in certain brokered deposit transactions (Bevel). On October 14, 2008, Oxygen Unlimited line of credit was increased to $6. 4 million. On the same day, barely a week after drawing down $2. 6 million, Oxygen Unlimited drew down an allotting amount was deposited into the Oxygen Unlimited II account. On October 15, the $1. 6 million was transferred to the SIGH account. Also on October 15, 2008, Antagonistic approved an $800,000 loan to USIA, which was deposited into the USIA account on he same day. That brought the total transferred or deposited into the USIA account on October 15 to $2. 4 million. On the same day, SIGH wired $2. 4 million to the Bedford Consulting Group account at Bank of America. Also on the same day, a check for $2. 4 million was issued from the Bedford Consulting Group and deposited into Antibiotics personal checking account at the Park Avenue Bank. On October 16, Antagonistic wrote a check to the Bank for $2. 4 million, again calling it a personal capital investment. On November 15, 2008, Antagonistic approved an additional $2. Million in a line of credit to USIA. On November 17, SIGH drew down $1. 5 million from this newly extended line of credit and deposited the money into the SIGH account at the Bank. On November 10, SIGH wired the $1. 5 million to the Bedford Consulting Group account at Bank of America, Just as had previously occurred with the two prior investments. On November 10, a $1. 5 million check was issued from Bedford and was deposited into A ntibiotics personal checking account at the Park Avenue Bank, again, Just as had occurred with the two prior investments. On November 17, Antagonistic made a final personal capital investment of $1. Million to the Park Avenue Bank. This brought his total investment to $6. 5 million. In exchange for his investment, Antagonistic gained 308,349 shares of Park Avenue Bannock, Inc. , the Park Avenue Bank holding company. This brought Antibiotics common stock ownership in Park Avenue Bannock to 316, 617 shares, from Just over 1% to approximately 52% of the common stock issued and available. This in effect made him a majority shareholder. Prà ªt Barbara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, is quoted by Wiser and Dash as saying that Antibiotics personal capital investment was the functional equivalent of Monopoly money. Yet this did not stop Antagonistic from trying to gain as much leverage as he could from his supposed investment. On October 14, 2008, the Treasury Department announced the beginning of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). On November 14, 2008, the Park Avenue Bank applied for $11,352,480 in TAPER funds. The application was accompanied by a letter from the Banks outside counsel, who indicated in the letter that the Bank had managed to raise $5 million in capital by October 17, 2008, due to the capital investment by Antagonistic (the additional $1. Million was not yet invested at the time of the letter). In addition, according to witnesses, while the application was being reviewed, Antagonistic stressed to the IBID in multiple phone conversations that he had made a sizable personal investment, and that this investment should count favorably toward the Bank getting approved for TARP funds. And in December 2008, when the Bank sent the IBID its proposed capital restoration plan, it noted as an important matter than Antagonistic had invested $6. 5 million as part of the effort to stabilize and restore the Banks capital position (Bevel). Unfortunately for Antagonistic, the Banks financial situation continued to deteriorate while its TARP application was under review, and in February 2009, Antagonistic was informed that the IBID would not be able to recommend the Park Avenue Bank for approval of TARP funds. The Bank subsequently withdrew its application, later indicating in a press release that the Walworth was completely voluntary Owe to ten Banks change AT pollen regarding TARP funds. Antagonistic is quoted in multiple sources as having said, l dont need TARP money, I dont necessarily want TARP money, we are a strong bank, and management is committed to putting capital in as it is needed. To add to Antibiotics woes, in April 2009, USIA filed for bankruptcy. As was described earlier, SIGH had an $800,000 loan and another $1. Million in credit that was funneled through various accounts so that Antagonistic could make his investments. At the time that USIA filed for bankruptcy, the entire $2. 3 million balance was still outstanding. Antagonistic did not want the $6. 5 million scam uncovered, so he could not risk SIGH defaulting on the $2. 3 million outstanding it would raise too many red flags. So another scheme was devised in order to pay off the $2. Million that SIGH owed the Park Av enue Bank. In June 2009, SQ, one of the Oxygen-related entities, purchased a majority of stock in General Employment Enterprise, Inc. GEE). Mr.. W became the chairman of GEEs Board of Directors and appointed Mr.. Y as CEO of GEE. Both Mr.. W and Mr.. Y work for Mr.. X. SQ required GEE to open an account at the Park Avenue Bank and to transfer funds into that account. On July 23, 2009, $2. 3 million was transferred from the GEE account to a Park Avenue Insurance account, which was also at the Park Avenue Bank. As aforementioned, Antagonistic owned Park Avenue Property and Casualty Insurance Company, which is the company with which the Park Avenue Insurance account was associated. The $2. 3 million transfer was authorized by Mr.. Y, who was at the time CEO of GEE. On August 17, 2009, Antagonistic used the $2. 3 million to pay off Gigs outstanding balance. In order to cover the misappropriation of GEEs funds, Antagonistic created a bogus 90-day Certificate of Deposit Receipt, which Mr.. Y showed to the GEE Board of Directors when asked about the missing $2. 3 million. In early October of 2009, Antagonistic returned a certification of the CD, falsely indicating that the $2. Million CD existed when in fact it did not. Numerous bank employees have verified that no 90-day, $2. 3 million CD for GEE ever existed. From November 24 to December 9, 2009, $2. 3 million was wired to the GEE Park Avenue account from various Oxygen-related entities, none of which had business dealing with GEE. The final scam of which Antagonistic is accused involved defrauding two Florida pastors out of $103,940. In 2009, the two Florida pastors and their congregation raised some money to start construction on a church (they currently met at a rented store front, but were hoping for something more permanent). The pastors had met with architects and contractors and were looking into financing options when they met Mr.. Z. As previously mentioned, Mr.. Z worked for Mr.. X. Mr.. Z told the pastors that he could quadruple their money by investing in discounted treasury bonds which would sell at a profit in foreign markets. Mr.. Z provided fabricated proof that he had engaged in such transactions previously and that he worked for the Park Avenue Bank in New York. The pastors bought in to the scam and wired $103,940 to the Park Avenue Insurance account at the Park Avenue Bank on July 3, 2009. Antagonistic enthroned the Park Avenue Insurance account, as was previously detailed. The pastors, of course, never saw a return on their investment, nor have they been able to reclaim any of the original investment. They called the bank, sent letters to the bank, and even visited the bank in New York in an attempt to see Antagonistic, for whom they believed Mr.. Z worked. It all amounted to nothing. In the five weeks following the transfer AT ten Into Nils Park Avenue Insurance account, Ontological wrote $35,000 in checks to Mr.. Z and transferred $60,000 of those funds to his personal checking account. In September 2009, Antagonistic directed his assistant to book a flight for Mr.. Z to Switzerland. On October 27, 2009, Antagonistic was interviewed by IBID examiners and was specifically questioned about the source of the $6. 5 million that he purportedly invested. During the interview, Antagonistic was presented with a diagram that showed the movement of funds from Park Avenue Bank loan proceeds, to Oxygen Unlimited, Oxygen Unlimited II, and USIA, to the Bedford Consulting Group, and ultimately to Antagonistic himself. Antagonistic tried to convince the examiners that the $6. 5 million came from the sale of some of the Bedford stock to Mr.. W, but the numbers did not line up. On October 30, Antagonistic resigned his position at the bank. On March 12, 2010, the NYSE seized the Park Avenue Bank and appointed the IBID as received. The IBID sold the bank to Valley National Bank out of New Jersey, which immediately took control of operations (Wiser and Dash). On March 15, Charles J. Antagonistic, Sir. Was arrested at his home. He was charged with 10 counts of fraud, bribery, embezzlement, and misappropriation of funds (Wee and Bray). In researching this case, I was struck repeatedly at how Antagonistic was able to get away tit so much without being caught. While it is true that he was ultimately caught, his shenanigans remained undetected for some time, and when they were brought to light, it wasnt by the Bank or the Banks auditors, who were conspicuously missing from the complaint filed against Antagonistic. Ironically, Antagonistic was under investigation for 5 months before the claim was filed against him, and he was under investigation because the Ecuador office of the Department of Homeland Securitys U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) learned of a person interested in engaging in an illegal business deal with Antagonistic. The matter was turned over first to the New York ICE office, then to the El Dorado Task force, which specifically investigates financial crimes (Wee and Bray, ICE Press Release). All in all, the counts against him read almost like fiction that one man could have done so much in such a relatively short period of time. And the unnamed co-conspirators makes it read like a business mob story. But unfortunately, it is all true. One man, who put his personal greed ahead of his professional duties, helped to bring about the end of he Park Avenue Bank (Prà ªt Barbara, as quoted in Minister).